top of page
Search

Before You Plan: 9 Board Questions That Make or Break Your Strategic Plan

In my last article, I talked about strategic planning as a kind of Google Maps for your nonprofit, a roadmap with a clear destination, a default route, and alternate paths you can use when conditions change.


There is one more thing Google Maps assumes before it gives you directions: that your car is actually ready to make the trip.


The same is true for your board.


Before you commit time, money, and energy to a strategic planning process, it is worth asking:

Is our board really ready to lead the plan we say we want?


Many nonprofits skip this step. They head straight into a retreat, generate pages of ideas, and only later realize things like:

  • The board is not aligned on its governance role

  • People do not share a common understanding of the financial reality

  • There are very different views on risk, equity, or what “success” even means

That is when a plan stalls or quietly ends up on a shelf.


Why I start with a board engagement snapshot

Before I facilitate any strategic planning process, I use a brief Board Engagement Health Assessment with each board member.


It is an online self assessment built around nine core questions about how the board is currently engaging its governance responsibilities.


Instead of just asking “Are we ready?”, we look at how the board is actually functioning across nine dimensions:

  • Board engagement and governance – Do board members understand and consistently practice their governance role, instead of drifting into staff work or staying hands off?

  • Financial resilience and stewardship – Does the board understand the financial model and share responsibility for oversight and sustainability?

  • Strategic direction and learning – Does the board spend its time on the organization’s most important strategic priorities and use information to guide decisions?

  • Leader sustainability and succession – Is the board actively supporting, supervising, and planning for the executive’s long term sustainability and succession?

  • People, culture and wellbeing – Does the board pay attention to staff culture, wellbeing, and retention at the governance level, without trying to manage HR directly?

  • Impact and program effectiveness – Does the board define success in terms of outcomes for the people or causes you serve and regularly review meaningful information about program effectiveness?

  • Partnerships, community trust and reputation – Does the board understand how key stakeholders experience your organization and see trust and relationships as part of its governance role?

  • Operations, systems and risk – Does the board understand major operational risks and ensure appropriate policies, systems, and controls are in place?

  • Equity, inclusion and values alignment – Does the board use your stated values and an equity lens to guide decisions and check whether practices align with the communities you serve?

Taken together, these questions create an engagement snapshot, a simple picture of where the board is strong, where practice is inconsistent, and where there are gaps that will affect your ability to carry out any strategic plan.


How this snapshot changes your planning conversation

Once we have this snapshot, three things become possible.

  1. You name reality together.

  2. Instead of one or two people quietly worrying about board dynamics, you have a shared, depersonalized way to talk about how the board is functioning.

  3. You focus governance development where it matters most.

  4. If the assessment shows that your board is strong on mission but unclear on financial resilience or risk, we know where to invest training and retreat time before and during planning.

  5. You design a strategic planning process that fits your true starting point.

  6. You can decide, up front, how much of your retreat should be focused on clarifying roles, financial model, or impact measures, so you are not trying to do everything at once.

When boards take time to ask and answer core readiness questions, the planning process is more focused, the resulting plan is more realistic, and implementation is stronger.


In my work, the Board Engagement Health Assessment is the way we have those readiness conversations with structure and data instead of guesswork.


From “Are we ready?” to “What kind of plan are we ready to lead?”

The goal is not to decide whether your board is “good enough” to plan.

The goal is to understand what kind of plan you are ready to lead right now and what needs to be strengthened so you can lead it well.


Sometimes that means a full, multi year strategic plan.

Sometimes it means a focused 18 month plan with a parallel track of governance work.Either way, you make that decision with your eyes open.


If Article 1 was about why you need a roadmap in this environment, Article 2 is about checking the engine, tires, and fuel gauge before you hit the highway.


If your organization is thinking about strategic planning in the next 6 to 12 months, a board engagement snapshot is one of the simplest, highest leverage steps you can take.


If your organization is considering a strategic planning process starting in August or September, this is the time to get that snapshot and readiness conversation on the calendar.


If this resonates:

  • Like this article and follow my page to see the final piece in this series, where I share how I turn this snapshot into a strategic planning process your board can actually use.

  • If you would like to explore using the Board Engagement Health Assessment as the first step in an August or September planning process, you can schedule a brief consultation with me here.



Further reading on board readiness and strategic planning

If you want to explore more perspectives on board readiness and strategic planning, these are helpful starting points:


 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page